I had a bill from vodafone yesterday and to understand it you definitely need a university degree. I know that for this company to have people not undertsanding the bill is part of the strategy. But sex has to be understood and to be transparent. So why isn't it!
Take for example oral sex. Bill Clinton had his cock sucked but he claimed it was not sex!!!! Wow! Here was his justification.
With that, Clinton may have been given the room to offer a technically "true" denial to the question of whether he had sex with Lewinsky--even if she happened to perform fellatio on him. The truncated definition characterizes sex in terms of a checklist of body parts, including the genitals, breast and thigh. Oral sex would not necessarily require the President to touch anything on Lewinsky that appears on that list. Strange as it may sound, under one reading of the definition, Lewinsky could have been having sex with him (because she was "touching" the President's genitals) while at the same moment, he was not having sex with her. (At the deposition, Clinton wasn't asked if she had sexual relations with him, just if he had them with her.) Isn't the law a wonderfully intricate device?
But this blog is not about Mr Clinton but it is about oral sex. I am amazed how many abbreviations we have connected with oral sex.
So here is a quiz and I will put the answers to it on my next blog.
All you have to do is tell me what the abbreviations mean. Easy??? And I can assure you I never made them up!
1. BJ
2.BB
3.BBBJ
4.BBBJTCWS
5.CBJ
6.CIM
7.FW
8.FWO
9.DATY
10. O
So there we have it. And there are probably many more.
If you need me, get in touch.
dariax@hotmail.co.uk
0039 3281769818
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento